It seems there is considerable debate as to what type of metabolic training is the best... aerobic vs anaerobic.
Ok, what training metabolic?
What is talking about all this anaerobic aerobic vs?
Metabolic training is conditioning exercises conducted in order to increase the capacity and the ways of the energy efficiency for storing and providing energy for the activity.
Most people usually refer to this as cardio.
There are three ways of the energy used to provide power for the activity an aerobic and anaerobic two.
These energy which must train track is the source of much controversy way, aerobic, anaerobic vs dilemma.?
Aerobic activity Aeróbico means in the presence of oxygen and any activity that performs an intense low to moderate for more than 90 seconds, allowing the oxygen to free energy metabolism, usually called an aerobic activity.
The benefits of aerobic activity are reduce function increase cardiovascular in body fat aerobic activity negatives are most people for aerobics in the aerobic anaerobic controversy vs anaerobic capacity reduced speed decreased energy decreased force decreased muscle mass reduction rely heavily on capacity to reduce body fat... but fail to mention that they are also losing muscle, strength, power, speed and ability to anaerobic, together with the reduction of fat aerobic activity.
And here is the truly shocking news low intensity exercise = higher fat loss is a myth!
OK... Let me clarify.
Low intensity exercise burned 50% of fat for fuel-intensive, while exercise burns around 40% of fat for fuel... so you could say that low intensity exercise burns more fat as fuel high-intensity exercise.
But let's say 100 calories you burned in 20 minutes of exercise of low intensity (50 calories from FAT), and that burning 160 calories in 10 minutes of high-intensity exercise (64 calories from FAT) still burn more fat throughout with exercise intensity than the low-intensity exercise.
There is also another advantage of the high-intensity exercise... that increases your metabolism much after the exercise has been completed.
More fat burnt in less time and increased metabolism during hours of training... sounds pretty good to me.
Anaerobic activity Anaeróbico means, in the absence of oxygen and any activity that performs a medium-high intensity for less than 2 minutes, where energy is derived without oxygen, usually called an anaerobic activity.
There are two pathways of anaerobic energy where energy is derived from re-síntesis (ATP) from creatine adenosine triphosphate (ATP-CP) is anaerobic system / phosphate (COP) stores are exhausted about 5-7 seconds.
The anaerobic system lactate (glucolítica) occurs after stores (COP) have been exhausted in stations of body to the breakdown of glucose for energy.
This results in the production of lactate and... leading ultimately to fatigue hydrogen ions.
The benefits of anaerobic activity are increase cardiovascular function body fat reduction increased muscle mass increase in improving power speed increase in aerobic capacity anaerobic activity negative force improvement are anaerobic activity requires an aerobic base when I see the differences between the benefits of aerobic and anaerobic training metabolic often wonder why there is an anaerobic controversy aerobic vs... the choice seems obvious.
Is the dispute all the aerobic vs anaerobic is?
I believe that anaerobic aerobic vs controversy arises due to an inadequate understanding of the aptitude and the use of a definition of poor fitness.
Physical fitness is a commitment of cardiorrespiratoria resistance, strength, flexibility, power, speed, coordination, agility, balance, precision and hardness.
For an excellent physical condition that must be physically train "optimize" your performance in all physical capabilities... and not to "maximize" performance in a capacity at the expense of others.
For people who do not understand that fitness is a compromise, the idea that, already the aerobic workout is indicative of a higher level of fitness is predominant.
However, do not realize is that by focusing on the training extended aerobic that they are doing little or nothing to improve the physical capacity to other fitness excellence and actually decreases its excess of all fitness levels.
And no, the formation of mixed extended aerobic with the building of the "isolation" exercises body is not the answer.
Then, what is the answer?
Simple to educate all the roads of energy by the low-intensity variation long average intensity, average duration and, high intensity short duration of metabolic training.
Put an end to the anaerobic controversy aerobic vs making a compromise between the two.
Let us be honest unless you is training to be an athlete of resistance, there is no need to train as a.
The truth is that most activities were found in the sport, work and life are a combination of all the energy that flows seamlessly tracks from one to another.
Instead of front aerobic anaerobes must be aerobic and anaerobic!
To exclude the formation of all energy path greatly decreases metabolic training performance improvements.
My advice ending the anaerobic aerobic vs controversy!
Adding high intensity short duration of metabolic training for its plan exercise fitness and vary the intensity, changing methods of training and regularly changes high intensity short duration of medium intensity, duration medium and low intensity, long.
Home » exercise electrocardiography » Aerobic Vs Anaerobic why Controversy about them